Saturday, December 24, 2011

Obligatory "what's with the title?" sticky post (Scroll down for new stuff)


First, the obvious question: Who is Themistocles? He was an Athenian general, statesman, and crafty politician who was responsible for the survival of pre-classical (or early classical) Athens (480 BC), the city whose classical-period cultural and political flourishing would not have occurred otherwise than by his machinations. Classical Athens is one of, if not the most important, source of our Western heritage. Cleisthenes may have founded its democratic style of governance (508 BC), but Themistocles assured its survival, against incredible odds by defeating a large Persian naval force. The Greek forces were badly outnumbered. Themistocles, through a combination of political acumen and foresight had convinced his fellow Athenians to use a windfall discovery of silver to finance the formation of a naval force.
This allowed him to gain de facto control of those naval forces. His persuasion and guile convinced the combined Greek navy to anchor at Salamis, a small island off the mainland. That same guile convinced the Persians to fight in the narrow waters. They were badly beaten. The narrow confines did not allow them to fully deploy their forces. Themistocles set the trap, and triggered it. This one event preserved the possibility of Western culture.


The battle of Thermopylae, is a more famous event in the Persian wars, and took place only a few weeks before this decisive naval battle. The heroic self sacrifice of the Spartans is an oft told story, and rightly so. But, they were defeated by the Persians. The Persian army was poised to lay waste to Greece. The only conceivable way to prevent this was to damage the Persian navy. Themistocles accomplished this.
If things had ended with Persian victory, we would probably be only dimly aware of Athens, and it certainly would not have survived to give us Pericles, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Aristophanes, Aeschylus, and too many others to mention. So we owe a great deal to Themistocles. What is interesting is that he came to be reviled by his own countrymen shortly after this pivotal event.


So, this brings me to the word "shade" in the title. There is a clumsy double meaning here: First, we have to familiarize ourselves with one of Aesop's stories:


Two Travelers, worn out by the heat of the summer's sun, laid themselves down at noon under the wide-spreading branches of a Plane-tree. As they rested under its shade, one of the Travelers said to the other: "What a singularly useless tree is the Plane. It bears no fruit, and is not of the least service to man." The Plane-tree interrupting him said: "You ungrateful fellows! Do you, while receiving benefits from me, and resting under my shade, dare to describe me as useless, and unprofitable?

"
Themistocles, when defending himself against accusations of conspiracy with Sparta, compared himself to this plane tree, unappreciated giver of shade. He certainly was in a sense used by the Athenians to protect themselves from a storm. But for Themistocles, they would not only have lost their homes, but freedom or life. Xerxes intended to kill or enslave every Athenian. While he did succeed in putting the town to the torch, he did not succeed in the latter. Once the storm had passed, though, the Athenians turned on Themistocles, plucked his leaves and hacked his branches, having no more use for him.


This pattern seems to repeat. Churchill was rejected. Truman ended his presidency unpopular, as did G.W. Bush. Yet, we still live under the shade cast by such men. Because of their actions and the men and women of the United States and allied military our world is relatively secure.

The United States is a a sort of plane tree for the world.

A second sense of the word "shade": Shades are ghosts by another name. Ghosts stand alongside us, expecting we do right by them, and protect what they have provided us.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Tuesday Blues

Bo Diddley - Who Do You Love?

Monday, November 23, 2009

FPI Fact Sheet: The case for a fully resourced counterinsurgency strategy for Afghanistan | Foreign Policy Initiative

FPI Fact Sheet: The case for a fully resourced counterinsurgency strategy for Afghanistan Foreign Policy Initiative

Posted using ShareThis

Good point by point answer for several standard reasons to abandon COIN in Afghanistan

Monday Madness

The Liberty of Norton Folgate

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Senior Day last week Navy v Delaware



9 and 3 coming up next week -v- the Rainbow Warriors.

KSM in Civilian Court.

Some well considered questions from Sen. Graham:





Some rather remarkable things have been said in response to questions like these. For instance:

We needn't worry that KSM was never read his Miranda rights, because the evidence against him is overwhelming. Also sprach Senator Patrick Leahy. (Ditto for UBL, should we ever find him.) No need to fret about these particular defendants, in federal civilian courts not having been Mirandized. No worries.

Do you think that the defense lawyers these guys will find (or who will be clambering to volunteer) people like Ramsey Clark or Lynne Stewart, will passively accept this line? Not if they are worth their salt. Clearly, they will at least try to argue that you cannot try someone that has not been Mirandized, this on the solid grounds that the decision to try them in a civilian court brings with it all the legal protections afforded defendants in that setting.

Nor can we expect that arguments made out of concern for national security will sit easily with them as they go through the mining process that is discovery.

Nor can we expect that they will leave well enough alone the promising line of defense that their client was subject to torture, even if it is true that he confessed to 9/11 well before water boarding.

Nor can we expect that valuable information will fail to be passed to our enemies as it is mined, and that court transcripts will be valuable sources of intelligence for the enemy.

Nor can we expect that security will be inexpensive.

Nor can we expect that our enemies will fail to see that they can argue that precedent has now been set, that military tribunals should be a thing of the past for enemy combatants. Neither should we be naive in this regard vis the lawyers that would represent them.

The remarkably arbitrary manner in which Holder and others appear to have decided who should go to civil courts and who should not, will not hold up to serious legal scrutiny, and demands for consistency of explanation and application.

Nor can we fail to see what a propaganda bonanza the proceedings will be for a pontificating KSM, playing to the worldwide audience of those who sympathize with his view of America, the West, and with his militant Islamic totalism. This will be one of, if not the show trials of the century. We will have essentially given the man his own television show, and his own You Tube channel.

Lastly, on the off chance that he is acquitted in a civilian court, with its attendant protections, we cannot do anything that can be interpreted as placing him in double jeopardy, without also expecting his defenders, legal and otherwise, to argue that to do so is against the very American values that Holder claims to be upholding by going ahead with this. The constitution is very clear on double jeopardy. Once again, no lawyer worth his salt will pass on the opportunity given.

So, we have taken a man who was ready to plead guilty before a military tribunal, and who would have been removed from this mortal coil, and have placed him in a situation where it is possible that he could go free, and brought with it all these attendant worries. We have done this when it was not necessary to do so, and for some ill-defined reason involving international opinion. Never in the history of warfare have we done this.

In two words, and with considerable understatement:

Ill-advised.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Al A. Gore, Super Genius



My always reliable wiki-sources tell me that Gore is slightly off. The core of the Earth is approximately 1.32 bajillion degrees Fahrenheit.





Seriously though, geothermal technology works. The in-laws have a geothermal system buried around their house in Michigan. It is very efficient both cooling, and heating, significantly reduces their bills. But, very pricey on the install side. It will no doubt pay for itself. But the cost is damn near prohibitive for most I suspect.